This has probably been said over and over in these forums....so apologies! Accepting the premise, to a greater or lesser degree, that ancient monuments were built with aesthetic and artistic considerations in mind (not just utilitarian or functional ones), and that such artistry had to do with interpreting and linking the environment (in it's wider sense) with the human experience....it seems odd that there has not been a widespread modern movement that shares the same ideas. By that, I mean that during our wanderings in search of ancient art, into places with varying levels of remoteness, we don't come across large scale installations/sculptures/constructions from the modern era. And I don't mean stone circles or even stone building at all, today's invention would surely go into all kinds of areas not possible in prehistory. It just seems really strange to us that all the large scale rural structures that surround prehistoric art pertain to housing, living or farming? And that farmers can get permission for hideous and cruel eyesores like fully lit up no-graze cow sheds, yet I bet there would be trouble if anyone tried to raise a stone in a prominent wild position.