Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by Chance
close

This is my second attempt to post a message. Hope I am not duplicating.

I am an amateur historian, and antiquities research hobbyist. All my material is non-scientific and theory, based on previous publications and my own observations, coupled with satellite imagery when available.

My most important item I can share with the readers is that satellite software imagery, when captured and color-manipulated in a Photo manipulating software (contrasts, hues, saturation), can indicate under-water and even under-soil wall and art structures.

My most recent success I believe, is the Mound known as Silbury Hill, which seems to show a facial portrait of a King embedded in a vague stone outline on the side. In addition, the Mound is included in a fuller portrait, possibly of a King, possibly of a Queen, just to the East, with her hair or a helmet in the shape of a Ram's spiral, indicating construction in the age of Aries (I am guessing).

Just to the East is a larger figure, also in right profile, most probably of a King, and possibly the second of a Queen/King set.

M

Photos?

EdZiomek wrote:
My most important item I can share with the readers is that satellite software imagery, when captured and color-manipulated in a Photo manipulating software (contrasts, hues, saturation), can indicate under-water and even under-soil wall and art structures.
How?

I have geophysical and tomography surveys of the fields around Silbury and none of your markings show up on either of them.
Why?

PeteG

Hi Ed

One of your photo captions mentions "Where else can I post temporary image answers to valid questions?"

Have you tried Flickr?

http://www.flickr.com/

Not suggesting you shouldn't post them here - just answering your question! :)

G x

"Of the many purposes of Silbury, I believe it was also incorporated to be part of a "line of sight", message relay network, from the Southern/Western coasts of the UK towards the London area, as was done on the Great Wall of China, to alert central authorities of any invasions."

ive just had a look at the photos, i cant really see anything.

but this i thought was interesting. as if it was, then why would they build the hill behind another hill? wouldnt they build it on top of the hill as it would be seen more??

have you ever been to silbury hill?