You locked the thread so you could have the last (aggressive) word you naughty amateur historian and researcher. Well you can't!
I think another mistake you've made is a linguistic one. When people say they can't see it they don't mean they can't see it but they can't see it as signifying intentionality. Your faces are perfectly visible but others just don't see them as convincing deliberate faces. So it all comes down to that, a difference of opinion - why should you get angry at people for seeing the same evidence as you but being less impressed by it than you?
