Silbury Hill perspective

Silbury Hill 180

Image by jimit

The Eternal Jun 29, 2013 01:08:27

Make of it what you will, but I think this throws an interesting light on why Silbury Hill was built as tall and as flat-topped as it is.

The crop circle is irrelevant, but the view of Silbury Hill from it isn't.

Mimics the landscape in all respects, eh? Still doesn't tell us why though.

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2013/silburyhill/groundshots.html

Atb,
TE.

nigelswift Jun 29, 2013 05:22:38

Replying to The Eternal

Trouble is, we don't know if Silbury was originally built flat topped or changed later.

I can't resist commenting about the crop circle images. They illustrate something that's been evident for several years. Ever since the expert circle makers announced they were giving up, "someone" with a tenth of their skill has been trying to fill the gap. Who? Well cui bono? It's quite a big industry.

The circles used to be things of wonder, now they look far more like vandalism. It's sad.

Pilgrim Jun 29, 2013 20:35:03

Replying to The Eternal

The Eternal wrote:

Make of it what you will, but I think this throws an interesting light on why Silbury Hill was built as tall and as flat-topped as it is.

The crop circle is irrelevant, but the view of Silbury Hill from it isn't.

Mimics the landscape in all respects, eh? Still doesn't tell us why though.

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2013/silburyhill/groundshots.html

Atb,
TE.

Imagine it white.

Cope reckoned it was deliberately made to a height that was visible from the Ridgeway from around Hackpen Hill southward. if it was white (even if it was pointy) it would have made an interesting locus. It does seem to exude stillness when the viewer is moving...

Peace

Pilgrim

P.S. Crop circles will ALWAYS be vandalism.