Devil’s Quoits forum 15 room
Image by ocifant
Devil’s Quoits

Singular/plural?

close
more_vert

Mustard wrote:
Correctly speaking, shouldn't this site be referred to as "The Devil's Quoit" rather than "The Devil's Quoits"? I would assume that the plural version would correctly be used to refer to the henge along with the destroyed ring-ditches. But since the ditches have been lost, surely only one "quoit" remains, and is therefore singular rather than plural?

Quoits:

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/15207/devils_quoits.html

http://www.quoitboardsolution.com/Camera2_034.jpg

Quoit:

http://images.webster-dictionary.org/dict/103/883895-quoit.gif

I would assume that the use of the term "quoit" in this context is (confusingly!) different from the term "quoit" when applied to a chambered tomb.

I apologise for the pedantry, but it's really been niggling at me!

Being curious as well I looked it up and according to British History online, it was the devil throwing quoits (not one but several), really it should be named after 'Stanton'

"The Devil's Quoits, a henge monument c. 1,200 yd. south-west of Stanton Harcourt, (fn. 21) was used throughout the late Neolithic and Beaker periods, and comprised an embanked stone circle c. 280 ft. across, composed of 30 or more stones; it was mostly destroyed in the Middle Ages to make way for cultivation, some of the stones being broken and possibly re-used in Stanton Harcourt church. One of the three remaining stones was used as a bridge in the late 17th century and again in the late 19th or early 20th, but was replaced following protests from the Harcourts and local people. Only one of the stones was in situ in 1940 when the airfield was built over the site, later used for gravel workings, and the stones were buried; in 1988 there were plans to restore the monument incorporating the buried stones. (fn. 22) A tradition that the Devil hurled the stones from Wytham hill during a game of quoits was current by the late 17th century; (fn. 23) the idea that the monument commemorated a Saxon victory at Bampton in 614 originated in the late 18th"

From: 'Stanton Harcourt: Introduction', A History of the County of Oxford: Volume 12: Wootton Hundred (South) including Woodstock (1990), pp. 267-274. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=6925 .

moss wrote:
Being curious as well I looked it up and according to British History online, it was the devil throwing quoits (not one but several), really it should be named after 'Stanton'
Yeah, but I would assume that the "several" is a reference to the ring-ditches that no longer exist? Looked at with the ditches, the henge does look like one of a number of quoits (making it a quoit, singular):

http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/15207/devils_quoits.html

Being curious as well I looked it up and according to British History online, it was the devil throwing quoits (not one but several), really it should be named after 'Stanton'
British History online is a good resource - will bung it up on the Blogs and websites thread later.