http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/55945
I'm sure there's more to it than this. But the evidence put forth in the article is hardly convincing is it? So 14 people died in the space of (possibly) thirty years ? hardly unusual.
And surely it would also be hardly unusual to die by getting an arrow in your arse, I mean this could happen accidentally during a hunt. Yes it could have been murder - why should people in the neolithic have been any better tempered than now? it doesn't really mean the whole society was violent.
""We also know that the bodies of two people were scavenged and partially dismembered by dogs or wolves before their remains were buried in the monument." - well I thought it was common enough that bodies were left out to be nibbled before being popped in the barrows - the bones were often disarticulated when excavated? It's hardly news is it?
Anyway it couldjust be the way the BBC's interpreted it. Does anyone have any other information on this story?