Stonehenge and its Environs forum 134 room
Image by RiotGibbon
close

And it is not good news.
Planning Act 2008 (PA2008) – Sections 116 and 117 and The Infrastructure
Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 – Regulation
31
Application by Highways England for an Order Granting Development Consent
for the A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down
Notice of the decision by the Secretary of State
I write to notify you of the publication of the Secretary of State’s decision and
statement of reasons and the Order granting development consent in relation to the
above application.
The Secretary of State as the decision maker under s103 and s104 of the PA2008 has
decided that development consent should be granted and therefore has made an
Order under s114(1)(a) of PA2008.

More in link below
https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/TR010025/TR010025-001935-Notice%20of%20the%20Decision%20by%20the%20SoS%20(Reg%2023%20or%2031)%20GRANTED.pdf

The Stonehenge Alliance have issued this statement:

The Stonehenge Alliance deeply regrets a decision that will send shock messages around the world. It will breach:
• the UK’s international treaty obligation (World Heritage Convention 1972) not to damage the WHS;
and
• the UK’s legal commitment to address Climate Change.
We shall study carefully the detail of the Transport Secretary’s Decision Letter and the formal Report and recommendations of the Examiners of the road scheme, before meeting with colleagues to discuss any next steps.
With your fantastic support we shall continue with our campaign and petition in the hope that there may still be time in which to change that decision.

I found this a well-balanced read on the subject, avoiding a lot of the emotive and hyperbolic language used elsewhere. It sets out the conflicting views well without resorting to sensationalism.

https://wildhunt.org/2020/11/pagans-react-as-stonehenge-a303-tunnel-project-set-to-move-ahead.html

New Order Nov 2020:

"I feel the need for harmony
And I look around, but it's not what I see
I see angry faces looking at me
And I want to know what makes them so
For this world can be a dangerous place
But it's all we got, and it's quite a lot
Take a look at yourself......"

Don't take sides. Just do the right thing. Compromise, make it work.

Worth a read. Maybe a little off topic, maybe not. Either way thought it might be of interest.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00665983.2020.1769399

Another thoughtful take on the subject from an archaeologist, Dr Lisa-Marie Shillito:

"We must remember that news stories and popular writing are ultimately where people outside academia base their knowledge and opinions, and if we spin things, or even get it outright wrong, it can be very hard to change peoples’ views."

http://castlesandcoprolites.blogspot.com/2020/11/stonehenge-is-in-news-again.html?m=1

£20K raised really quickly. It's going to be quite a fight.
Please help if you will and can.

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/save-stonehenge-world-heritage-site/?fbclid=IwAR0fv2cJ3Y-MtCGtB1Bf_pTXT5rZed4DK03CdsnjJS8vOmNUhf7z1a-cMTM

I think people are really missing the fecking point here. The tunnelling out of millions of cubic shintloads of soil and archaeology will create a Silbury somewhere else. The crazy excavators, JCBs, Lorries, big tunnelly-borer machines and tarmac laying gear will for sure be a blight on the landscape. The debate here (and elsewhere) seems to rotatey-diskers on whether the tunnel should be...
1. the size that the feckwads are planning on building
or
2. much, much bigger and much much longer.

Now shall it be the Horseless Carriage or the Iron Horse? Shall it be the knife or the briny deep?
No-one has suggested that those visitors to Stonehenge who dislike traffic should just learn to fecking live with it. How did the offended tourists get to Stonehenge in the first place - perhaps by hoverboard? If the sounds of passing lorries and agricultural vehicles offends them perhaps Stonehenge should be uprooted and re-erected somewhere much quieter (perhaps in Norfolk). No-one has mentioned my designs and plans for a possible flyover bridge. No-one has seriously looked at green camo-canvas masking of the current road to protect the eyes of the 21st Century needy and sensitive.

Perhaps we really need to look at the demolition, flattening and re-landscaping of Callanish Village? And the subsequent submerging of the A858 in a tunnel and eradicating all modern agriculture on Lewis so that our 21st Century senses aren't offended by the sound of Texel Sheep and Massey Fergusons.

Let us look at Orkney. Burn the Viking Sagas! Throw George MacKay Brown's works on the peat hearth flame! The A895 will have to buried under a tunnel! The little townships and broch stumps will have to go. Use them as backfill for the tunnel! Let us get remixing, remodelling and re-imaginising Orkney back to the active period of Ring of Brodgar. Or shall it be the active period of Skara Brae? Who cares? As long as it isn't today. Or tomorrow.