yes, but it's a thin front leg and fits along a waterway. for me, the match between the eye and winchester, or nearby, oriented the whole figure, and made sense of the "beak" at the salisbury river fork. when we tilt it in your way, the cambrian leg doesn't end in pembrokeshire, yet the mersey/ribble feature is the strongest non-horse detail.
the tail, too, if it plots a route through scotland, should pass through inverness.
i am happy to know it is being seen by other people.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Hugh Whiting
4th August 2007ce
23:21 |
A theory on the origin of the UWH (BuckyE, May 23, 2007, 14:35)- Re: A theory on the origin of the UWH (tiompan, May 23, 2007, 15:11)
- Re: A theory on the origin of the UWH (VenerableBottyBurp, May 25, 2007, 16:10)
- Re: A theory on the origin of the UWH (wysefool, May 29, 2007, 19:15)
- Re: A theory on the origin of the UWH (Hugh Whiting, Jul 24, 2007, 14:07)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: A theory on the origin of the UWH (nigelswift)