KK and Moth, I think you've convinced me of the huge advantage it would be to have HA a resource where any and every endangered site could be found, in one capacity or another.
I think actually there's not much difference between our positions and it's just a question of presenting some sites in the form of links or whatever with a bit of an HA disclaimer attaching to them, and then all our ambitions, inclusiveness and safety, can be reconciled. Maybe we should transfer any discussions of exactly how we do it onto the HA board.
But there's still room for a discussion here on the general principle: when does radical action become counter-productive ?!.....
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 22nd January 2004ce 16:01 |
Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Kozmik_Ken, Jan 21, 2004, 14:31)- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Rhiannon, Jan 21, 2004, 15:15)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Rhiannon, Jan 21, 2004, 15:16)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Kozmik_Ken, Jan 21, 2004, 15:29)
- HA? (jimit, Jan 21, 2004, 16:10)
- Re: HA? (Pete G, Jan 21, 2004, 16:23)
- Re: HA? (Vybik Jon, Jan 21, 2004, 16:29)
- Re: HA? (nigelswift, Jan 21, 2004, 16:31)
- Re: HA? (Cursuswalker, Jan 21, 2004, 16:46)
- Re: HA? (Vybik Jon, Jan 21, 2004, 17:06)
- Re: HA? (nigelswift, Jan 21, 2004, 17:08)
- Re: HA? (Vybik Jon, Jan 21, 2004, 17:35)
- Re: HA? (baza, Jan 21, 2004, 19:04)
- Re: HA? (nigelswift, Jan 21, 2004, 19:09)
- Re: HA? (Moth, Jan 21, 2004, 21:49)
- Re: HA? (nigelswift, Jan 22, 2004, 01:13)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Rhiannon, Jan 21, 2004, 16:37)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Rhiannon, Jan 21, 2004, 17:02)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Vybik Jon, Jan 21, 2004, 17:06)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (grrr, Jan 21, 2004, 17:29)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (baza, Jan 21, 2004, 19:02)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Kozmik_Ken, Jan 21, 2004, 23:14)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (johnb, Jan 22, 2004, 02:03)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Moth, Jan 21, 2004, 15:27)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (GordonP, Jan 21, 2004, 17:16)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (baza, Jan 21, 2004, 18:58)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS W (Grendel, Jan 21, 2004, 21:30)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Moth, Jan 21, 2004, 21:39)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Moon Cat, Jan 22, 2004, 01:53)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Kozmik_Ken, Jan 22, 2004, 10:00)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (nigelswift, Jan 22, 2004, 11:15)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Moth, Jan 22, 2004, 11:30)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (Kozmik_Ken, Jan 22, 2004, 11:47)
- Re: Nine Ladies, POSSESSION ORDER THIS WEEK!! (TMA Ed, Jan 22, 2004, 11:52)
- Re: Nine Ladies, EVICTION FORTHWITH (Rowan_1, Jan 22, 2004, 15:04)
|
|