FW>Draw a circle. Put three points in one quadrant of its circumference.
FW>Remove the circle. You are left with two points in a straight line and one slightly off it.
I see what you mean. Thanks!
FW>The post holes at Stonehenge could be a bit of a timber post circle, which I find more
FW> interesting than and Orion connection.
Interesting thought. It does seem more likely that, if there were such a large circle, the construction of the car park might intersect only part of it (meaning that the coincidence of the siting of the car park becomes less of a coincidence).
In a way, it's a pity that only three post holes were discovered: if a fourth had been revealed, such a feature would have been more evident. Has anyone tried to find evidence for such a circle?
I wonder whether such a circle would have any relationship to the site of Stonehenge itself? (i.e. were the builders of Stonehenge I aware of the existence of the previous feature, given that c.5500 years separated them?)
Reply | with quote | Posted by pendant 19th January 2005ce 19:17 |
stonehenge mesolithic post holes (Treeman, Dec 26, 2004, 02:59)- Re: stonehenge mesolithic post holes (Treeman, Dec 26, 2004, 03:03)
- Re: stonehenge mesolithic post holes (moss, Dec 26, 2004, 14:13)
- Re: stonehenge mesolithic post holes (smallblueplanet, Dec 26, 2004, 15:02)
- Re: stonehenge mesolithic post holes (fitzcoraldo, Dec 28, 2004, 15:27)
- Orion's belt? (pendant, Jan 18, 2005, 23:35)
- Re: Orion's belt? (FourWinds, Jan 19, 2005, 07:12)
- Re: Orion's belt? (pendant, Jan 19, 2005, 19:17)
- Re: stonehenge mesolithic post holes (Dave1982, Oct 29, 2014, 17:14)
|
|