The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian
Home Latest Posts Forums Maps Help
Browse Sites News Blog Contributors The Books
Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   Maeshowe Forum Start a topic | Search
Maeshowe
Re: Pretanike-Britain, Breton, Prythain or Picti?
85 messages
Select a forum:
A tangent on this from listening to Radio 4 yesterday - one commentator on a programme about legends of giants in Cornwall suggested that the 'giants' were Scandinavian invaders, while the 'pixies/piskies' were Picts.

The idea was that, if you're a Pict (average height c. 5 feet), the average Viking is fairly tall, and as with all legends, is likely to grow in the telling. The fact that invaders would have been likely to have occupied easily-defensible positions such as hilltops would also fit with so many of the legends of giants depicting them as living at the tops of hills.

The Picts, meanwhile, are small from a Viking viewpoint, and also likely to get smaller as the legend is told, and their familiarity and affinity with the landscape could appear as 'magic'. There may also be an etymological connection between 'Pict' and 'Pixie'.

Needs some work, but it's an interesting theory.


Reply | with quote		Posted by Zastrozzi
4th May 2005ce
08:37

In reply to:

Re: Pretanike-Britain, Breton, Prythain or Picti? (PeterH)

1 reply:

Re: Pretanike-Britain, Breton, Prythain or Picti? (BigSweetie)

Messages in this topic:

Terms & Conditions  |  Home  |  Julian Cope presents Head Heritage Top of page