|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian General Discussion Forum | Start a topic | Search |
 Re: geo tangent 15 messages | Select a forum: |
ryaner wrote: nigelswift wrote: http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/forum/?thread=71053 IMO whether some scientists were misquoted is hardly the point. The main issue is geocentricism itself. Followed closely by holocaust denial. “Most folks think that they have done this rather well (though they have only covered what the layout of Stonehenge was probably for, not the inner stones) “ We don’t know what Stonehenge “was probably for “ although it is incredibly unlikely that the various features were dug /erected to describe the basics of geocentric thinking . What is clear from the earliest mention of the film , to date , including clips and interviews with producers Sungenis and De Lano is that it is worse than nonsense and anyone knowingly connected with it with any integrity has spoken out against the content . Even the prehistoric understanding has a major error , De Lano suggests /believes obliquity is a constant when it obviously is a variable , although a minor point compared with the rest of the crap it could and should have been highlighted . Reply | with quote |  20th April 2014ce 15:48 In reply to: Re: geo tangent (ryaner) |
Messages in this topic: |
|