The thing about there being worse/more important things going on elsewhere if of course true and permanently pricks my conscience. I guess the only defence is that trying to make things better in a small way in your own back yard isn't actually wrong. Parochial but worthwhile.
As for the access/conservation issue, yes they are mutually exclusive and mutually destructive so letting either have full dominance makes no sense. So it has to be a compromise, depending on circumstances. Access where the damage is limited, restrictions where it's significant.
On that basis, 35,000 slightly tipsy revellers crowded into a small space in the dark is pretty insane. Fewer people, more supervision, less damage...
 Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift
27th February 2015ce
05:38 |
Stone circle etiquette (ironstone, Feb 19, 2015, 10:36)- Re: Stone circle etiquette (scubi63, Feb 19, 2015, 12:23)
- Re: Stone circle etiquette (nigelswift, Feb 19, 2015, 13:24)
- Re: Stone circle etiquette (moss, Feb 19, 2015, 13:31)
- Re: Stone circle etiquette (Mustard, Feb 19, 2015, 16:05)
- Re: Stone circle etiquette (tjj, Feb 19, 2015, 17:38)
- Re: Stone circle etiquette (GLADMAN, Feb 19, 2015, 20:46)
- Re: Stone circle etiquette (carol27, Feb 25, 2015, 23:05)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Stone circle etiquette (thesweetcheat)