I am afraid that in my opinion the best thing to do is exactly what they plan, make an exact replica and keep the original protected. Given there are a small minority of morons in every community = the larger the nearby population the larger the number of morons = the greater the chance of the stone being abused. Places such as Kilmartin can get away with leaving rock art exposed as it is a much more rural spot with a much lower population. Therefore much less likely to be abused. I know this is far from ideal but at least the stone will remain protected until (hopefully) at some point in the future the stone can be revealed in all its glory without the fear of damage? Just my opinion :)
 Reply | with quote | Posted by CARL
7th September 2015ce
11:44 |
Revealed for the first time in 50 years (juamei, Sep 06, 2015, 22:15)- Re: Revealed for the first time in 50 years (drewbhoy, Sep 06, 2015, 22:20)
- Re: Revealed for the first time in 50 years (juamei, Sep 09, 2015, 08:11)
- Re: Revealed for the first time in 50 years (Sanctuary, Sep 09, 2015, 13:21)
- Re: Revealed for the first time in 50 years (drewbhoy, Sep 16, 2015, 20:15)
- Re: Revealed for the first time in 50 years (moss, Sep 28, 2015, 10:19)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Revealed for the first time in 50 years (nigelswift)