nigelswift wrote:
However, the sought rise ain't going to come.
That was certainly not the intention Nigel. The current post was meant to be light-hearted and the ones you highlighted were in direct reply to what I felt were unbalanced posts of your own. On more than one occasion I have shown concern for you personally as you seem to concentrate totally on the bad side of detecting and not enough on the good many people have brought to the table. It wears thin and will drive people away.
At least I get a chance to reply back here unlike on HA where you only allow comments that fall in with your way of thinking or ones that you can easily defend. I repeat, I am concerned for you. You are a good guy yourself doing a great job, but please don't become just a one-trick pony when you also have so much to offer in other areas. I mean that sincerely.
Roy
Reply | with quote | Posted by Sanctuary 16th November 2015ce 08:35 |
Detectorists 2 (spencer, Oct 15, 2015, 21:02)- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 15, 2015, 23:13)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 27, 2015, 08:32)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 29, 2015, 07:55)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (nigelswift, Oct 30, 2015, 05:58)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (tjj, Oct 30, 2015, 10:29)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 30, 2015, 11:06)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (nigelswift, Oct 30, 2015, 12:05)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Howburn Digger, Oct 30, 2015, 14:46)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (tjj, Oct 30, 2015, 14:51)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 30, 2015, 15:21)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (nigelswift, Feb 04, 2016, 08:57)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Oct 30, 2015, 16:53)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (sleeptowin, Nov 02, 2015, 16:36)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (Sanctuary, Nov 14, 2015, 12:43)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (moss, Dec 04, 2015, 09:00)
- Re: Detectorists 2 (scubi63, Dec 23, 2015, 22:03)
|
|